Origin of the name “InteDelta”
We are often asked where the name “InteDelta” comes from. It’s a contraction of “Integration” and “Delta”. Delta in a mathematical context means a small change. The mathematical theory which underpins much of risk management and quantitative finance involves solving differential equations by the process of integration, which sums infinitesimally small changes. Our logo also has a hint of the mathematical symbols for integration 
and delta 
.
Integration and change is also relevant in the context of our consulting work. We deliver change for our clients, often by integrating new systems, policies or processes into their organisation.
Client
Financial markets division of major retail and commercial bank
Region
UK
Client need
The client wished to upgrade its credit risk management system for its dealing room business. The client needed advice in respect of the required functionality and whether it should buy a vendor solution or build in-house.
Our deliverables
We initially produced a high level functional requirements document and a roadmap for how this would be delivered over the coming years. This involved helping the client to clarify its policy and methodology in a number of areas.
We produced a business case for the system which included an analysis of the build or buy options.
We identified a shortlist of potential vendors that would meet the client’s requirements and, in conjunction with the client, produced the questionnaire for the Request for Proposal and scored the responses submitted by the vendor.
We performed business analysis in relation to the implementation of the first phase of the system and wrote the functional requirements specification.
We also provided systems development and business analysis for a number of tactical systems initiatives.
Client
Pension fund manager
Region
Benelux
Client need
The client had decided to upgrade its risk management capabilities and was in the process of building a risk management department. The client had produced a draft risk management policy but wished to have this reviewed to ensure compliance with best market practice.
Our deliverables
Having held a series of meetings with senior client employees to ensure we fully understood the business, we reviewed the policy to identify areas of policy and procedures which could be improved and where the client fell short of best market practice. The scope included all areas of the fund manager’s risk practices including market risk, liquidity risk, tracking error and compliance with investment mandates.
Our findings were detailed in a report which was presented to management.
Client
Retail and commercial bank
Region
Middle East
Client need
The client wanted to improve its operational risk capabilities, in respect of governance, product approval process, control self-assessment and Key Performance Indicators.
Our role
We assisted in the identification of gaps and the development of processes and controls to improve the operational risk environment.
Client
Major hedge fund manager
Region
UK
Client need
The client needed to develop a methodology for the measurement of credit exposure for certain products (credit and equity related) which could not be handled by its current risk management system. This was required both for limit control purposes and for the measurement of economic capital.
Our deliverables
We developed a methodology for the measurement of potential future exposure and documented this in a methodology paper. We developed a model for the calculation of exposure which the client now uses on an ongoing basis in its business.
Client
US Investment bank
Region
UK
Client need
The client aimed to re-engineer its collateral management infrastructure to meet (and ultimately exceed) market best practice. The scope of this initiative covered all of the bank’s collateralised product lines (OTC derivatives, repo, securities lending, futures & options, prime brokerage) and the end-to-end collateral process – from margin management to inventory management and the pledging of collateral.
Our role
We provided:
- Advice on market best practice across all areas of the collateral management process
- Analysis of existing environment and identification of system, process and organisational shortcomings
- Advice on the strengths/weaknesses of collateral management software vendors
- Strategic advice on functional and architectural design and future state operating model.